HL7 needs a fresh look because V3 has failed

edwin_uestc · 发表于 2011-8-16 21:29:50

Posted on August 15, 2011 by Grahame Grieve

评论：
Michael van der Zel
Were is HL7 v1? HL7 v2 is very well known and implemented. HL7 v3 is “broken”? So HL7 v4 will be heaven
Same thing with Linux. v2.0 is stable, v2.1 is developer, v2.2 is stable, etc.
You need inbetween versions to explore and discover.
Some steps are needed to get us further, so I think we are getting there.
Rome was not build in 1 day

sfinder · 发表于 2011-10-21 07:05:58

知音啦，我８年前就感觉到了。看我０２年的贴子

edwin_uestc · 发表于 2011-10-21 19:19:56

回复 2# sfinder
呵呵坛子里的帖子我大多都爬过了我接触挺晚的也没有像哥哥一样那么深入呀
求交流
512139097

sfinder · 发表于 2011-10-26 11:08:34

回复 3# edwin_uestc

我主要是做实做的。国家级整合（千万人口）省级整合（百万人口）。对理论研究的比较少

edwin_uestc · 发表于 2011-10-26 14:58:10

回复 4# sfinder
嘿嘿谢谢最后都是要走上实做这条路只不过我还在刚上路你已经在前面了

		自动登录	找回密码
密码			欢迎注册